United Nations Human Rights: The water crisis has a “major impact on human rights” expert says

Office of the high commissioner

15 March 2021

The water crisis has a “major impact on human rights” expert says

Water is the lifeblood of human beings, and all life on Earth,” David R. Boyd, UN expert on human rights and the environment said while presenting his latest report to the Human Rights council in Geneva, Switzerland

“And yet, over 2 billion people lack access to safely managed drinking water. Over 4 billion people lack access to safely managed sanitation. Water shortages now affect more than 3 billion people. Three quarters of all the natural disasters in the last twenty years were water-related, including floods, landslides and other extreme weather events.”

In his report, Boyd describes the causes and consequences of the global water crisis, focusing on the negative impacts of water pollution, water scarcity and water-related disasters on the enjoyment of a number of human rights, including the rights to life, health, water, sanitation, food, a healthy environment, an adequate standard of living, development, culture, and the rights of the child.

“Eighty per cent of wastewater is discharged into the environment untreated, contaminating surface water, groundwater, soil, and the oceans. Waterborne disease causes nearly 2 million preventable deaths worldwide annually, with the greatest burden falling on children under 5 years of age.”

Boyd further pointed out that the effects of the global water crisis fall disproportionately upon vulnerable or marginalized groups – including women, indigenous peoples, minority groups, refugees, persons with disabilities, older persons, and people living in poverty, and are compounded by factors such as age, gender, poverty, disabilities and cultural or ethnic background.

In addition, he indicated that protecting marginalized populations’ rights would also enable them to contribute greatly to water solutions, naming women and indigenous peoples as key actors in improving the way water is used, allocated and managed in urban and rural households and in local communities.

Boyd reminded States, however, that they primarily have the obligation to ensure safe and sufficient water and called on them to apply a rights-based approach to all aspects of allocating, managing, conserving, protecting and restoring water.

In his report, he outlines seven key steps that States should take to fulfil their human rights obligations, including conducting a state-of-the-water assessment; conducting a legal mapping and strengthening initiative to ensure that human rights are incorporated in water and wastewater laws, regulations and policies; develop or revise water-related plans to incorporate a rights-based approach; implement water-related plans and enforce water-related laws, regulations and standards; evaluate progress;
building human, financial and institutional capacity; and informing and engaging the public, particularly women, youth and other vulnerable and marginalized groups.

Boyd’s report also highlights the responsibilities of businesses, naming them as a major contributor to water pollution, water overuse, and degradation of freshwater ecosystems, through deforestation, the damming of rivers, the extracting, transporting and burning of fossil fuels, industrial agriculture, intensive livestock operations, industrial fisheries, the fashion and textile industries, large-scale mining, and the commodification of water and nature.

“Businesses have outsourced many activities that pollute, overuse water and damage freshwater ecosystems from high-income nations to low-income nations, exploiting environmental and human rights standards that are lower or not enforced,” he said.

“Businesses must adopt human rights policies, conduct human rights due diligence, establish transparent and effective grievance mechanisms, remedy human rights violations for which they are directly responsible, and work to influence other actors to respect human rights where relationships of leverage exist.”

Boyd also raised the issue of environmental defenders, including clean water advocates who, he stressed, continue to be murdered, criminalized, and intimidated. He urged States to do more to protect them.

Ultimately, Boyd added, ensuring safe and sufficient water is essential to protecting a wide range of human rights and achieving the UN Sustainable Development Goals.

Zum Beitrag

 

Ölbohren im Okavango Delta: Africas’s Carbon Gigabomb

News sky
By Alex Crawford, special correspondent

Africas’s Carbon Gigabomb
„[…] Fridays For Future Windhoek, a local environmental group, has already dubbed the oilfield a >Carbon Gigabomb<, which, if the fuel extracted is used, it says could release up to 51.6 billion tonnes of CO2 – the equivalent of one sixth of the world’s remaining carbon budget.“

Zum Artikel

Petition von Fridays For Future Windhoek: #SaveTheOkavangoDelta: Keep the oil industry out of Africa’s natural treasure!

To: H.E. Dr. Hage G. Geingob , President of Namibia

Nature, wildlife and scarce water supplies in a unique corner of southern Africa are being endangered by a rush to drill for oil. A Canadian company is pushing to explore for oil in the Kavango Basin, an environmentally sensitive area. Please support the fight against a fossil fuel project that will drive the climate crisis.
Why is this important?

The Okavango Basin is an endorheic basin that covers an area of over 2.5 million km2 across Namibia, Angola and Botswana. The basin, which includes the Okavango Delta, is one of Africa’s most biodiverse habitats, home to a myriad of birds and megafauna species including the largest African elephant population left on the planet. The delta, a Ramsar and UNESCO World Heritage Site, remains one of the largest intact wetlands. Nearly one million people are dependent on the Okavango basin for their livelihoods.

ReconAfrica’s license is completely within the Kavango Zambezi Transfrontier area and overlaps with six locally managed wildlife reserves and a UNESCO World Heritage Site. African elephants, African wild dogs, lions, leopards, giraffes, birds and rare flora will be deleteriously affected by the project.

Environmentalists point to the Niger Delta in Nigeria, where oil exploitation by Shell and other corporations has caused an ecological and social nightmare. This must not be repeated in Namibia and Botswana.

Namibian and Botswana environmentalists anticipate the following impacts:

? The region’s ecosystem will be destroyed by a Canadian company that will rake in 90% of the profits.

? ReconAfrica’s project will lead us to burn through what little remains of the planet’s dwindling global carbon budget and hampers global efforts to move beyond fossil fuels. The company must not be allowed to destroy such a globally vital conservation area under the guise of economic development.

? Oil and gas extraction is a menace to wildlife. Loud noises, human movement and vehicle traffic from drilling operations can disrupt avian species’ communication, breeding and nesting.

? The infrastructure built for energy development can also have a negative impact: power lines, well pads, fences and roads fragment the habitats of many species.

? The construction of roads, facilities and drilling sites known as well pads requires the use of heavy equipment and can destroy big chunks of pristine wilderness.

? Such damage is often irreversible.

? Transporting the oil rig will destroy local roads. How heavy oil and gas industry equipment has impacted road infrastructure and led to deadly accidents has been amply documented in other countries.

? The region’s tourism industry will be shaken and thousands of people might not only lose their jobs, but their investments as well. Who would want to go on safari in a landscape littered with oil wells?

? The project would deplete and pollute the region’s aquifer. How can one justify giving an overseas company unbridled access to the region’s most precious resource?

? The project will worsen food insecurity in the region, as water is the life source of communities in the Okavango ecosystem.

Zur Petition

Walchenseekraftwerk: Verbände fordern besseren Schutz der Isar

BR
29. März 2021

Umweltverbände fordern, dass die Flusslandschaft der Oberen Isar bei einer Neukonzessionierung des Walchenseekraftwerks besser geschützt wird. Bisher wird viel Wasser zur Stromerzeugung in den Walchensee abgeleitet. Das bedrohe 200 Rote-Liste-Arten. […]

Walchenseekraftwerk sollte dem Staat gehören

Zu den Forderungen der Verbände gehört auch eine Verstaatlichung. Bayern solle Eigentümer der Anlage werden. […] Bisheriger Betreiber des Walchenseekraftwerks ist der Energiekonzern Uniper.

Zum Beitrag

ZDF: Flüsse in Not – Was unseren Fließgewässern zu schaffen macht

ZDF
21.03.2021

Flüsse in Not – Was unseren Fließgewässern zu schaffen macht
von Torsten Mehltretter

Etwa 15.000 Bäche und Flüsse gibt es in Deutschland. Sie sind die Lebensadern unseres Wasserkreislaufs. Doch nur acht Prozent sind in einem guten oder sehr guten Zustand. Der Klimawandel hinterlässt Spuren in den Gewässern.

Zum Beitrag

BUND Berlin: Bald auf dem Trockenen? (21.8.2020)

Bald auf dem Trockenen?

21. August 2020

Es ist ein Skandal: Die Berliner Wasserbetriebe fördern seit Jahrzehnten Trinkwasser ohne ordentliche Genehmigung, was die Moore und Wälder in der Stadt schädigt. Das ist nur eines von vielen Beispielen für den verschwenderischen Umgang mit einem kostbaren Gut, von dem es in der Trockenregion Berlin-Brandenburg zu wenig gibt.

Neun Wasserwerke betreiben die Berliner Wasserbetriebe, um die Hauptstadt mit Trinkwasser zu versorgen. Obwohl sie schon seit rund 100 Jahren Wasser fördern, haben nur drei von ihnen die offizielle Bewilligung zur Entnahme von Grundwasser. Zwar startete 1996 das Bewilligungsverfahren, doch nach Auskunft der zuständigen Senatsumweltverwaltung ist sein Ende nicht abzusehen. Währenddessen genehmigt die Verwaltung weiterhin den Um- oder Neubau einzelner Brunnen und ganzer Brunnengalerien auf Basis einer Duldung. Das ist kein rein formales Problem, sondern hat handfeste und negative Folgen für Wälder und Moore. Das weiß auch die Behörde der grünen Senatorin Regine Günther sehr genau, schließlich hat sie selbst eine Managementplanung für die Berliner Moore in Auftrag gegeben, die die Schädigungen durch den sinkenden Grundwasserpegel detailliert auflistet.

Das Grundproblem ist bei allen neun Wasserwerken gleich. Doch bei vier von ihnen ist die rechtliche Situation besonders, denn sie senken durch ihren Betrieb den Grundwasserstand in Gebieten, die nach der Fauna-Flora-Habitat-Richtlinie (FFH-Richtlinie) geschützt sind. Das Wasserwerk Friedrichshagen beeinträchtigt das FFH-Gebiet Müggelsee-Müggelspree, das Wasserwerk Spandau das FFH-Gebiet Spandauer Forst und die Wasserwerke Tiefwerder und Beelitzhof das FFH-Gebiet Grunewald. Weiterlesen